A few weeks ago I bought some film. From B&H. Cos supplies here are inconsistent and prices are getting ridiculous.
I bought quite a lot of film - Portra 160VC, 120 and 4x5. And cos I could I also bought some film I'd never seen on these shores - Ektar 100.
Then, cos I could, and I felt like I needed to take some more photos, and that I needed a good walk, I went back to this place - only more prepared, mentally, physically, and equipment wise.
I took some photos. And compared films.
I couldn't tell much difference.
But then I couldn't be arsed doing consistent scanning etc to match colour and grain and all those things that one looks at when comparing films.
I did, however, notice that Ektar is half a stop slower than Portra, which is quite a bit when you're dealing with 1/2sec at F2.8.
So the top is Porta.
The bottom being Ektar.
I like some of these shots.
I also like the walk.
Though I was still utterly knackered by the end.
And it still took as long as the first time.
Even though I was more prepared, mentally, physically, and equipment wise.
Saturday, 14 May 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I like Porta best in the first pair, but Ekta best in the others. Just to be unhelpful.
Post a Comment